It is of National and International importance that everyone, regardless of Party, be aware:
--Should Senator Obama and Senator Clinton obtain the Office of the Presidency, because of their narrow view of  "Iraq War" and Radical Islam; they will withdraw from Iraq.  Sen. Clinton has said: "..in 60 days after entering office." .  Example of narrow view of  "Iraqi War":  Today Wednesday, Senator Kennedy, during the Defense Committee meeting, requested of our  Defense Secretary  not to set an amount of money for Middle East War (plan for the year ahead), "to lock out the new President's ability" to change funding for the the War. The Candidates do acknowledge the need for a 'strike force' and a presence. They do support Afghanistan more than Iraq. They do know Iraq is part of the Middle East issue. They don't know that their actions demonstrate the refusal to realize  the war is "The Middle East War" - all Nations in and around Iraq will be directly affected by what happens in Iraq.

What makes these Liberal Democrat Candidates so dangerous?:
--They will never acknowledge  the international, especially third world, involvement of Radical Islam.  Iraq will remain a bargaining chip as these Candidates return our Nation to the "stable diplomatic table", method of agreement.
--They will not recognize the reality of fighting, again, for The Old "ideological struggle" many Americans and Free Nations  believe:  "...their Creator, with certain unalienable rights; ...are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness...";  VS  the tyrannical, borderless, lawless, "...what we call terror is to the jihadists (radical Islam), an act of war to undermine illegitimate regimes (Israel, Lebanon, Iraq in this article). ...Everything returns to the challenge of Iran.  It trains, finances, equips Hezbollah. It works (at this article's time) on a nuclear weapon... provide a safety net for the systematic destruction of at least the regional order...(09/10/06; Henry A. Kissigner;
After Lebanon, A flawed cease-fire won't end Hezbollah war against Israel; - reoccurred as recently as two weeks ago).". 
--These Liberal Democrats believe America can return to the diplomatic table:  "...I know there's some good folks who think this is just simply a law enforcement matter. IT IS NOT (My caps). ...We have to have confidence in liberty's power to bring the peace we want, and not shy away from helping people realize the great blessings of freedom.  ...There are some in the world who dismiss the capacity of liberty to take hold in parts of the world!".
 President Bush (Las Vegas Speech; 01/08) also addressed the twenty-plus year old, Foreign Policy that "...advocated stability as the cornerstone of Policy.  ...But stability just masks the hopelessness seethed beneath the surface" - the 'non-bullet' war.  Besides hopelessness, another major fault of the 'stability policy' is the belief that we (US / Free Nations) can help the people of these downtrodden countries with money and supplies. But all we do is allow those tyrannical leaders, a sure-fire method of avoiding responsibility for helping their own Citizens and perpetuating lawlessness/extortion to the tyrannical leader's own ends.

      Incidently, the changes, Iraq and Afghanistan are working to make in their governments, are as new an   experiment for them, as it was for America in 1776. 

--on 2/4 in San Diego Union Tribune, there is an article about how President Karzai and Prime Minister al-Maliki, (while touring Europe), are acting inconsistently in relation to placing the new leader of NATO and working withdraws.  On 2/5, in North County Times/AP "US Worries Sunni Backlash".  These two incidents do not appear related, at first glance; but they are related -- here's how:
     If the Liberal Democrat Candidates do enter office, March 28, 2009 is the 60th day!  President Karzi, Prime Minister al-Maliki, and the Sunni part of Iraq, and other Iraqi areas, have to start preparing now.  Some readers of this essay and the Democrats are saying that's what we want -- "Step up to the plate!".  Remember, the Democratic plan is to return to the diplomatic / stable conference table that didn't work for twenty-plus years: Pres. Karzai,  PM al-Maliki, and the Iraqi people have to be ready for both physical and emotional revenge - compromise at the diplomatic table:  "Iran can help Iraq. So can Syria.".   Iraq has already experienced America leaving.  President Bush remains steadfast in supporting those two Nations with whatever he can give them to aide their fight for  freedom.  Iraqi and Afghanistan people and government may have to surrender rights they have accomplished. They must position themselves (personally/locally) and their country's to be ready for a Radical Islam surge (Iran, al-Quaeda, Taliban) as Americans exit.

Because the Liberal Democratic Candidates, by action and by word, deny the role of the 'ideological struggle' of liberty vs borderless, lawless tyranny, Democrats will act to compromise the entire Middle East and some Third World Nations.  Democrats don't recognize the international nature of Radical Islam.  Radical Islam played  'both ends against the middle' causing the chaos "to at least destroy the regional order" in Pakistan.

In fairness, no Republican has indicated support for  The Old "Ideological Struggle". They do appear to shy away from "..the capacity of liberty to take hold in parts of the world".  All Republicans recognize the Human Rights Principle; but some feel it is only for Americans. "We can't be the police for the World".   Many have truly forgotten the role of  'liberty' in building a Nation.  Many developing Nations get the Democracy; but not the importance of  their citizens to develop their, individual skills, talents and abilities, without interference from their government - liberty.  Without liberty there is no 'life' or 'pursuit of happiness'!